Anti-Choice Oklahoma

The Oklahoma House has recently voted 80-12 in support of the Freedom of Conscious Act, also known as SB 1878.

The Freedom of Conscious Act is basically an act that takes all of the previously brought up anti-choice laws and combines them into one. This bill allows health care workers to refuse to participate in actions that they feel are contrary to their religious beliefs and moral convictions. It also states that employers would not be able to “discriminate” against health care workers who exercise this right to refuse.

It may just be me, but if you are not able to you know, do your job, because of your religious beliefs and moral convictions, shouldn’t you find another line of work? Makes perfect, logical sense to me.

Under this bill, women are also required to have an ultrasound prior to getting an abortion. It also requires that wherever abortions are provided, there are large signs stating it is “against the law for anyone, regardless of his or her relationship to you, to force you to have an abortion.”

What this bill is doing is simply using more scare tactics against women when they seek an abortion. It talks down to women saying that it is “against the law for anyone, regardless or his or her relationship to you, to force you to have an abortion” and saying that that is simply the only reason why a woman would choose to have an abortion in the first place. By forcing a woman to get an ultrasound done before getting an abortion, you are using emotional trauma in order to get the upper hand against women seeking abortions. If they feel bad, then maybe they will go through with the pregnancy, right? That’s the “logic” behind this bill. However, people are simply not understanding that women do not walk into abortion clinics with smiles on their faces. They are not waking up in the morning and saying to themselves “Wow, what a beautiful day to get an abortion.” These women have already thought about their options, they have weighed them and have made a decision that the government is simply doing their damnedest to tell them they have no right to make.

This bill also regulates the use of Mifepristone, or RU-486, medications used in performing chemical abortions. This is perhaps the most ridiculous point on this bill.

Why does the use of these medications need to be regulated? The bottom line is that your doctor should be the only person aiding in how you get your abortion performed; not the government. When the government starts regulating the use of a medication they begin to strip away the rights of women when it comes to reproductive health and they are putting more women in harm’s way by regulating the use of these medications by making them resort to other options in order to obtain an abortion. By regulating these medications a woman who is desperate for an abortion is not going to say “Oh shit, I guess I’ll just wait 9 months and have the baby since that is the only logical way out of this.” No, they are going to go to other measures in order to abort the fetus that they do not want. End of story.

With this bill receiving the vote, it is now on its way to the Senate for consideration. This bill has already went to Senate and passed. This is a shame for all women, especially those in Oklahoma. This is a violation of women’s rights and I simply cannot express the amount of disappointment I feel right now.

This entry was posted in anti-choice extremism, reproductive rights. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Anti-Choice Oklahoma

  1. Al says:

    While I share your concern over how this was passed, I think this pales in comparison to what is in store if the Republicans end up deciding on the next confirmation for the high court. Just one reason it is imperative people concerned about this issue vote Democrat

  2. Tim says:

    The bill already went through our senate and passed there. Governor Brad Henry vetoed the bill, and our house and senate both overwhelmingly overrode his veto.

    So this horrendous bill has already became law here in my horribly backwards state.

  3. Jenny says:

    thats like my doctor refusing me birth control because hes catholic!

  4. Al says:

    While I share your concern over how this was passed, I think this pales in comparison to what is in store if the Republicans end up deciding on the next confirmation for the high court. Just one reason it is imperative people concerned about this issue vote Democrat

  5. Tim says:

    The bill already went through our senate and passed there. Governor Brad Henry vetoed the bill, and our house and senate both overwhelmingly overrode his veto.

    So this horrendous bill has already became law here in my horribly backwards state.

  6. Jenny says:

    thats like my doctor refusing me birth control because hes catholic!

  7. Adam says:

    while I’m grateful I live in canada, I only wonder how long it’s going to take before religious fearmongers attempt to spread this kind of legislation to extinguish civil rights for religions view on morality . . .

  8. Adam says:

    while I’m grateful I live in canada, I only wonder how long it’s going to take before religious fearmongers attempt to spread this kind of legislation to extinguish civil rights for religions view on morality . . .

  9. Jess says:

    So infuriating!

  10. Jess says:

    So infuriating!

  11. Pingback: Fourteenth Carnival of Radical Feminists « Carnival of Radical Feminists

  12. cbmcginty says:

    Oh no, you mean Oklahoma officials want you to be aware of the fact that your “freedom” over your own body might actually be harming another human being. I guess harming isn't the correct term. Let's be truthfull. You are killing another human being, so you can not be bothered with the consequences of having sex. Because we all know that sex is supposed to be about fun not reproducing, right?

  13. I agree that if you can't preform your job, you should get a new one. However, I also believe the choice was made when you decided to have sex. Furthermore, calling it 'anti-choice' just gives justification to calling the other side 'pro-murder.'

  14. I agree that if you can't preform your job, you should get a new one. However, I also believe the choice was made when you decided to have sex. Furthermore, calling it 'anti-choice' just gives justification to calling the other side 'pro-murder.'

blog comments powered by Disqus